I picked my book on Thomas back up again and it has been great. I’m not too sure why I took such a long break but it was nice to read some fiction and what not. The past few chapters I have read have had a ton to do with the politics of officer assignments, and it was pretty crazy then, as I am sure it is now. A general’s clout had a lot to do with it all, who he knew, who is supporters were, and what politicians he knew. All of this often hurt the Army as a whole, anyone could see that through the appointments made by the Union at the start of the war, but they lasted well throughout the war as well. Bobrick (the author of the book) makes pretty big claims against some in Lincoln’s government and against Grant and Sherman. According to Bobrick everything from official reports to advisers minds were changed from time to time to make Thomas look a little less capable than what he was and Grant and Sherman more than they were. I don’t doubt that there was padding here and there, after all most of these men had major egos and hated to see them shrink. However to the extent that Bobrick claims that these changes and alterations were made, and the motivation behind them (to undo Thomas to build up Grant) I’m just not sure. Every historian has a bias so I am taking everything with a grain of salt. Thomas was a great commander and I am eager to read more on his successes. I do truly believe that he could have lead the Union armies to victory as well, however I will have to read some other sources in the future to determine if there were this many true plots against him.
-
Sentinels
-
Casualties
- 1,246 Casualties
Archives
Blogroll
Civil War
-
Correspondence
dscarroll on Ironclad Star Destroyers and D… dscarroll on The Man Who Made Grant …